Register the pxxc domain variants (.com, .nl, .eu) — REJECTED

• Type: chore (user action)
• Track: W (website)
• Status: rejected 2026-08-09 by the user, same day it was filed. The homework had already been done; the ticket restated a concern the user had already weighed and declined. pxxc.org is live and canonical, and that is the scope they want.
• Owner: —
• Related: [[docs-canonical-domain]], [[feature-web-tracker-and-host-portability]]

What was actually checked (2026-08-09, DNS)

Filed on the assumption the variants were free. Verified before closing:

So the user's recollection was right about the priority item: .com was gone before this was ever filed, which removes the "close it permanently for €30" framing the ticket was built on. The two ccTLDs are in fact still available — recorded here as a fact, not as a re-argument. The decision is made.

Why it is not worth reopening on a whim

The parked .com is a fact about the world now, not a gap we can close. If impersonation ever becomes a live concern, the defence that works is the one [[feature-web-tracker-and-host-portability]] already owns: our signing key, key continuity, and the fingerprint published in more than one place. That verifies an artifact no matter which address it came from, which is the property buying a domain never gives you. Reopen only if the user says so.

Log

• 2026-08-09 — filed and rejected the same day. Filed when resolving [[docs-canonical-domain]], on the assumption the variants were unregistered and the item was decaying. The user had already done this homework and declined; DNS confirms .com is registered (parked on non-responding nameservers) and .nl/.eu are free. Closed at the user's direction.