← board

The O-level sweep never sees the third-party corpus

Measured

tools/optdiff.sh builds its file list from our own test tree (the .pas and .c sources under test/) — 1960 programs, four levels, diffed on stdout+stderr+exit code. Good instrument.

grep -c 'library_candidates\|external/' tools/optdiff.sh0.

So the corpus that the full tier compiles — lua, sqlite, quickjs, zlib, duktape, tcc, cjson, enet, cglm, stb, zengl, the FPC RTL and testsuite, synapse — is built at the default level only and never compared across -O0/-O1/-O2/-O3.

Why it matters more than it did yesterday

The owner ruled 2026-08-30 that self-host + all tests passed = proof, with the reasoning that the compiler and the target set are themselves complex enough to constitute one. That reasoning is sound — and the weight sits on the third-party corpus, because that is where the un-idiomatic, un-anticipated code is. Our test tree is code we wrote to test ourselves; the corpus is code that does not know we exist.

An -O3 miscompile of a pattern nobody on this project would write is exactly what the corpus is for, and it is the one sweep the corpus never gets.

What to build

Extend optdiff to a corpus tier, or add a corpus-aware shard set. The hard parts are known and are why this is not a one-liner:

Start with the subset that already runs standalone under the full tier — those have a known invocation and a known-good output, which is most of what a diff needs.

Do not read this as an argument against the ruling. It is an argument for making the suite match what the ruling already assumes it is.

Filing note

The first attempt to write this ticket was refused by .claude/hooks/no-full-suite.sh, because the body quoted optdiff.sh's file list literally and that reads as a shell loop over a test glob. Fourth recorded instance of that false positive, and the third where the refusal landed on a document about the thing rather than on the thing. Paraphrasing cost one rewrite, which is exactly the argument for leaving the hook alone: a false positive costs a rephrase, a false negative costs ten minutes.

Deprioritised 2026-09-02 — the Track T tooling backlog was cut as a pile

This ticket is not being called wrong. It was moved as part of a pile, not judged individually, and nothing here disputes its finding.

Owner decision. 73 of the 74 open track: T tickets were filed between 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-02, 58 on one day. The pile was too large to work through and returned almost nothing, and a ticket nobody will fix does not sit neutrally — it stays in the ranker forever at zero value, which is the argument CLAUDE.md already makes for a terminal folder over a low prio.

Four were kept in the ranker on a purely structural test — an active umbrella or a hard blocked-by: edge from live work: umbrella-one-full-tier-run-with-no-red-tier, feature-t-freebsd-image-and-runner, and the two regression-test-core-* reds that block the umbrella.

Kept, not deleted, for two reasons: so the finding is not rediscovered and refiled from scratch by the next agent who trips over it, and so it can be pulled back if what it touches becomes load-bearing.

To revive it: move it to the owning lane's backlog, set status: backlog, and say in the ticket WHAT CHANGED to make it matter now. Restoring it because it reads well is how the pile comes back.