← board

A csmith batch record does not say which -O levels it compared

The instance

devdocs/progress/backlog/feature-c-csmith-differential-fuzzing.md, section D1, records:

tools/csmith_fuzz.py --target aarch64 --iters 150 --seed-start 300100

136 ran clean across pxx -O levels, 14 skipped, no findings.

tools/csmith_fuzz.py:595ap.add_argument("--opts", default="0,2", ...). No --opts in that command, so the batch compared -O0 against -O2 and never built -O3. At the time, ir_codegen_aarch64.inc carried 10 -O3 gate sites by tools/check_o3_backend_parity.py's own count — every W1 slice that had been ported. The one tier the batch could not see is the tier those sites live in.

Nothing in the write-up is false. "Across pxx -O levels" is an accurate description of a two-level comparison. It is what a reader takes from it that is wrong, and the reader has no way to tell: the command is quoted in full and the missing information is a default, which is invisible by construction.

Why the fix is in the harness, not in anyone's discipline

The natural response is "pass --opts 0,2,3 next time". That fails the same way the next time, because the failure mode is not forgetting — it is that the record of a run cannot be checked against what the run did. A reader auditing D1 today has to know the default's value and its history to catch it.

Suggested shape, in the harness's own voice, which it already has for the oracle (it prints NO ORACLE for aarch64 (LP64) -- aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc: not installed and drops the bucket rather than reporting a comparison it did not make — exactly the right instinct, applied to one axis and not this one):

Whether --opts should default to 0,2,3 is a separate question and probably not: changing it silently re-prices every existing run's cost. The record is the bug; the default is a design choice.

Gate

T's own. This is a reporting change; no compiler behaviour is involved.

Deprioritised 2026-09-02 — the Track T tooling backlog was cut as a pile

This ticket is not being called wrong. It was moved as part of a pile, not judged individually, and nothing here disputes its finding.

Owner decision. 73 of the 74 open track: T tickets were filed between 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-02, 58 on one day. The pile was too large to work through and returned almost nothing, and a ticket nobody will fix does not sit neutrally — it stays in the ranker forever at zero value, which is the argument CLAUDE.md already makes for a terminal folder over a low prio.

Four were kept in the ranker on a purely structural test — an active umbrella or a hard blocked-by: edge from live work: umbrella-one-full-tier-run-with-no-red-tier, feature-t-freebsd-image-and-runner, and the two regression-test-core-* reds that block the umbrella.

Kept, not deleted, for two reasons: so the finding is not rediscovered and refiled from scratch by the next agent who trips over it, and so it can be pulled back if what it touches becomes load-bearing.

To revive it: move it to the owning lane's backlog, set status: backlog, and say in the ticket WHAT CHANGED to make it matter now. Restoring it because it reads well is how the pile comes back.