← board

Track T by default: no lane could be inferred from tools/run_pascal_conformance.sh. This is a FALLBACK, not a finding — nothing here says the defect is Track T's, only that the test source did not name an owner. Re-lane it before working it.

origin/master has advanced 8 commit(s) since this sha. Re-verify at current HEAD before acting — the callback is tagged to the sha that was tested, which may no longer be the state of the tree.

regression: test-pascal-conformance#shard4/6 red at f6303d410d78 (auto-filed by twatch)

Repro

tools/testmgr.py --tier full --job 'test-pascal-conformance#shard4/6' at f6303d410d783b2cbfad4ba500bf86bfa1a53b6d

Range

The named sha f6303d410d78 CANNOT be the cause — it touches no buildable file (docs / tickets / tstate only). It is the sha that was TESTED, i.e. the upper bound of an untested range; the cause is somewhere below it.

bad f6303d410d78, last good 90501813d990, 1 commit(s) in range — the watcher narrows this by idle bisect; check tstate/TSTATE.md for the current range.

Log tail

eader says %fail is an FPC IMPLEMENTATION limitation ("assembler symbols not global"), not a language rule — PXX passing is correct
SKIP tgeneric1.pp — gap: objfpc `generic TList<_T> = class` / `specialize` syntax not parsed
SKIP tgeneric30.pp — wontfix: dialect-pass — mode-delphi generic method impl without <T> — PXX's Delphi-generics rewriter deliberately accepts the bare name (3d71edcf); not a bug
SKIP tgeneric7.pp — gap: generics across units + $R range-check state per unit (expects runtime error 201)
SKIP tgeneric85.pp — gap: accepts-invalid — invalid generic record body accepted (pre-specialization checking)
SKIP tgenfunc3.pp — gap: generic class functions (generic class function Add<T>) not supported
SKIP tgenfunc9.pp — gap: generic methods with private/protected visibility specialized from caller
SKIP tobject2.pp — gap: old-style `object` types with virtual methods, constructor/destructor
SKIP toperator1.pp — gap: operator overloading (+) on records declared in units; cross-unit operator resolution
SKIP toperator9.pp — gap: operator overload for `in` on a record type not supported by the parser
SKIP tprocvar1.pp — gap: old-style `object` types with constructor/virtual methods (same gap as tobject2.pp / tsealed6.pp). Its procvar content passes now — the previous reason named three gaps (method pointers, @Class.Method, typed-const procvars) and a fourth found chasing it (anonymous procedural types); all are fixed, and unskipping shows `object constructor init` is what is left.
SKIP tsealed6.pp — gap: `object abstract` / `object sealed` modifiers in object declarations
SKIP tstring4.pp — wontfix: reads ansistring refcount/length header words — FPC internal string layout
test-pascal-conformance: 55 pass, 5 fail, 26 skip, 5 auto-gated (of 91)
test-pascal-conformance: FAILURES: tgenconstraint14.pp(accepted-invalid) tgenconstraint25.pp(accepted-invalid) tgenconstraint30.pp(accepted-invalid) tgenconstraint36.pp(accepted-invalid) tgenconstraint4.pp(accepted-invalid)

Stub ticket: signal only. Track T agent (face 2) enriches or a dev track takes it from the repro line.

2026-08-30 (coordinator) — RETRACKED T → P, with a mechanism, and it points at TODAY'S object change

The ticket's own banner says Track T here is a fallback, not a findingtools/run_pascal_conformance.sh names no lane — and asks to be re-laned before being worked. Re-laned to P (Pascal frontend): the failures are generic constraint checking, which is frontend semantics.

All six shards report the same family, from the report's excerpt:

test-pascal-conformance: FAILURES: tgenconstraint10.pp(accepted-invalid)
  tgenconstraint16.pp(accepted-invalid) tgenconstraint21.pp(accepted-invalid)
  tgenconstraint27.pp(accepted-invalid) tgenconstraint32.pp(accepted-invalid)
  tgenconstraint6.pp(accepted-invalid)

accepted-invalid = the test is { %FAIL } and we no longer reject it.

The mechanism, read out of the test sources rather than inferred from timing. ugenconstraints.pas:65 declares TTestObject1 = object, and three of the six specialize a template with it:

test specialization constraint must
tgenconstraint6 TTest1<TTestObject1> TTest1<T: class> FAIL
tgenconstraint10 TTest3<TTestObject1> TTest3<T: TTestClass> FAIL
tgenconstraint16 TTest5<TTestObject1> TTest5<T: IInterface> FAIL

object is exactly what changed on master todaybug-p-object-value-types-standard-meaning, landed d23f52948 ~08:50Z: object in type-declaration position stopped being a rooted class reference and became the standard value type, lowered as an advanced record. The shards went NEW-RED in the 09:10Z full tier, twenty minutes later, and no compiler file changed between that tier and the next.

This is a mechanism plus a coincidence in time, NOT a verified cause. I have not bisected and I have not run a single one of these tests. The disconfirming measurement is one command and belongs to whoever takes this: run tgenconstraint6.pp against pinned and against HEAD. If pinned rejects it and HEAD accepts it, the link is established; if both accept it, the cause is older and the timing is a coincidence.

Note the shape if it IS the object change: a value type should fail a class constraint more obviously than a rooted class reference did, so "we stopped rejecting it" suggests the constraint checker lost the information it was deciding on rather than deciding differently — and a checker that falls through to accept is one that may be accepting other invalid specializations silently. That is the reason to price this above the compat table's "we accept a form FPC rejects → not a defect" row: these tests were GREEN this morning. A gated suite going from reject to accept is a regression whatever the philosophy says about laxness, and the laxness ruling is about deliberate dialect choices, not about a check that stopped firing.

tgenconstraint21 (TTest8<ITest1>) and 27 (TTest15<TTestClass4>) do not involve object at all, so either the cause is broader than the object change or there are two causes. Do not close the shards on the object link alone.

SUPERSEDED 2026-08-30 — one defect, six views

Root cause found and filed as [[bug-p-generic-type-constraints-are-parsed-and-discarded]] (P, p70). Closing this shard ticket in its favour; do not work it separately.

The mechanism. pasparser_generic.inc:1321 consumes a generic constraint and never records it (Next; { skip the constraint list }), so no specialization has ever been checked against one. Constraint checking is not broken — it was never written.

Why it appeared today. d23f52948 gave object its standard Pascal meaning, which made ugenconstraints.pas parse. Before that, its line 65 (TTestObject1 = object) killed the whole shared unit, so every test importing it failed to compile and reported green for a reason unconnected to what it tests. Verified against both binaries: pinned rejects with "unexpected token in a unit interface section ... in: ugenconstraints.pas", HEAD accepts.

The count in these tickets is a shard artifact. Six shards reported; the real figure is 35 of 35 FAIL-marked tests that use that unit, wrongly accepted on HEAD.

Not a revert. Reverting restores green by restoring a false green, and re-breaks real Pascal source. These reds are the first accurate report this suite has given about constraint checking.