Track guessed as N from the FAILING STEP — line 2 of 5,
/tmp/test_nilpy_dictupdkw26 | diff -u test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.expected -, which namestest/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.expected. Not from the job's name or itssrc: those describe what the job is ABOUT, and this job's recipe spans 2 source file(s). The ranker reads frontmatter, so this line — not the body — decides who works it; correct it if the guess is wrong.
origin/master has advanced 5 commit(s) since this sha. Re-verify at current HEAD before acting — the callback is tagged to the sha that was tested, which may no longer be the state of the tree.
regression: test-nilpy#src:test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.npy at 16993f9196cf in step 2/5, /tmp/test_nilpy_dictupdkw26 | diff -u test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.expected - (auto-filed by twatch)
- Type: regression (auto-filed by Track T watcher, host seven, twatch
883da23adb0a). Untriaged. - Found: 2026-09-10T13:44:50Z
- Test source: test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.npy test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.expected
- Failing step: line 2 of 5 of the job's recipe; it names
test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.expected./tmp/test_nilpy_dictupdkw26 | diff -u test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.expected -
Repro
tools/testmgr.py --tier full --job 'test-nilpy#src:test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.npy' at 16993f9196cfbf820b5316b6cc0ccad881c6b7f8
Range
The named sha
16993f9196cfCANNOT be the cause — it touches no buildable file (docs / tickets / tstate only). It is the sha that was TESTED, i.e. the upper bound of an untested range; the cause is somewhere below it.
bad 16993f9196cf, last good 8dbfe1659549, 7 commit(s) in range — the watcher narrows this by idle bisect; check tstate/TSTATE.md for the current range.
Log tail
pascal26:66: warning: Nil Python: no class here declares a .update() with a parameter named 'r' — dispatching on the receiver at run time
pascal26:72: warning: Nil Python: no class here declares a .update() with a parameter named 'a' — dispatching on the receiver at run time
pascal26:72: warning: Nil Python: no class here declares a .update() with a parameter named 'a' — dispatching on the receiver at run time
ok: /tmp/testmgr-scratch-775162/test_nilpy_dictupdkw26 [code=1380120B data=84876B bss=58604B procs=2274]
--- test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.expected 2026-08-29 16:03:42.825941361 +0000
+++ - 2026-09-10 13:33:50.818628084 +0000
@@ -10,14 +10,4 @@
{}
{'sum': 6, 'txt': 'ab', 'none': None, 'lst': [1, 2]}
{'p': 1, 'q': 2}
-{'r': 1, 's': 2}
-{'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': 3}
-{'x': 1, 'y': 2}
-True
-{'a': 0, 'b': 1, 'c': 2}
-{'k': 1, 'y': 2}
-{'k': 1, 'z': 9, 'w': 5}
-{'x': 1, 'b': 2}
-{'f': 7}
-{}
-{'q': 1}
+pyeval: host method update has no parameter named r
Stub ticket: signal only. Track T agent (face 2) enriches or a dev track takes it from the repro line.
Log
- 2026-09-10 — auto-closed by the seven watcher:
test-nilpy#src:test/test_nilpy_dict_update_keywords.npypasses at 8cc1b9a526b2 (tier full); it was red at 16993f9196cf. Reopening is by a fresh NEW-RED stub, since a second red is a second finding with its own range.