← board

Track T by default: the FAILING STEP named no owner. Line 2 of 2 is tools/expect_same.sh c_sigwait26 "$(/tmp/c_sigwait26)" "$(printf '1 0\n2 0\n3 1\n4 0\n5 0\n6 10\n7 -1 1\n8 0\n9 0 10\n10. The job's own src (test/c_crtl_signal_and_wait.c, 2 file(s)) is NOT used here on purpose: it is what the job compiles, not what broke, and guessing a lane from it is what sent three reds in one job to the wrong lane. This is a FALLBACK, not a finding — nothing says the defect is Track T's. Re-lane it before working it.

origin/master has advanced 1 commit(s) since this sha. Re-verify at current HEAD before acting — the callback is tagged to the sha that was tested, which may no longer be the state of the tree.

regression: test-core#src:test/c_crtl_signal_and_wait.c at 0affa5fa87f4 in step 2/2, tools/expect_same.sh c_sigwait26 "$(/tmp/c_sigwait26)" "$(printf '1 0\n2 0\n3 1\n4 0\n5 0\n6 10\n7 -1 1\n8 0\n9 0 10\n1… (auto-filed by twatch)

Repro

tools/testmgr.py --tier native --job 'test-core#src:test/c_crtl_signal_and_wait.c' at 0affa5fa87f4f09ab29cd3d30db695d05bb93f9b

Range

The named sha 0affa5fa87f4 CANNOT be the cause — it touches no buildable file (docs / tickets / tstate only). It is the sha that was TESTED, i.e. the upper bound of an untested range; the cause is somewhere below it.

bad 0affa5fa87f4, last good 6a084d56931a, 2 commit(s) in range — the watcher narrows this by idle bisect; check tstate/TSTATE.md for the current range.

Log tail

ok: /tmp/testmgr-scratch-792792/c_sigwait26  [code=343832B  data=15600B  bss=81484B  procs=884]
expect_same: MISMATCH [c_sigwait26]
--- expected
+++ actual
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 15 1
 16 1
 17 7
-18 1
+18 0
 19 1
 20 1
 21 3

Stub ticket: signal only. Track T agent (face 2) enriches or a dev track takes it from the repro line.

Triaged (frankZ, plexus, 2026-09-02) — does not reproduce here, and nothing since could have fixed it

Binary 5df66928aa3979df, commit 67cf9588a, reseeded from stable_linux_amd64/default/pinned (converged after 2 round(s)), gate.sh quick GREEN.

208 runs, 208 matching the expected string exactly:

how runs mismatches
serial, idle box 40 0
8-way concurrent 40 0
32-way concurrent under 16-way CPU saturation (12-core box) 128 0

The last row is deliberately the hostile one: this is a signals-and-wait test, and the shape that would fail intermittently is a timing or delivery race under the 16-way matrix seven runs. It did not.

And it was not fixed since. 0affa5fa87f4 is an ancestor of origin/master with 5 commits after it, of which exactly one touches compiler/ or lib/crtl/1f4003e56, labels-as-values on i386/arm32/riscv32, which cannot reach a native signal test. So "already fixed" is not available as an explanation; something has to own the difference.

No flake history either. Over the 50 history entries in seven's state this job has 1 NEW-RED and 0 FIXED — its first red ever. That is the opposite of the signature the two known umbrella flakes carry (10 NEW-RED / 11 FIXED and 10/10), so this is not the same animal, and I am not calling it a flake.

The residual, and who owns it

"Not reproducible on plexus" is half a finding. The open question is whether seven's environment differs in something this test is sensitive to — signal disposition inherited from the runner, a wait racing the harness's own child reaping, or the per-run scratch directory. Track T owns that, because it is a question about the host and the harness, not about the compiler. The next native or full run on seven decides it: a second red makes it real and gives it a second data point, a pass clears it. Deliberately NOT resolved — resolving it on 208 green runs somewhere else would be exactly the exculpation that names no owner for "then what?".

Log